Dori HolteAbout the Author:

Doreen Lenz Holte is mom to a 27-year-old who stutters, author, and world-wide parent advocate for families with children who stutter. Holte’s first book, Voice Unearthed: Hope, Help, and a Wake-Up Call for the Parents of Children Who Stutter, published in 2011, shared her research findings, her family’s  journey through speech therapy, and their successful efforts to get their son talking again.  Her second book, VoiceS Unearthed: The Impact of Childhood Intervention on Those Who Continue to Stutter, was published in 2023. Holte interviews 60 adults to gain the long view of the impact of therapy focused on fixing. Holte lives in Golden Valley, MN with her husband Peter and enjoys hanging out with all of her adult children – three boys and one lovely daughter-in-law.

Someone should have told my grandmother that one size does not fit all. My mom was born in 1934 – in the heart of the depression. She claimed that her mother could not afford to buy new size shoes when her shoes became too small. I assume my grandmother figured any shoes were better than no shoes. I doubt she realized that wearing those too-small-shoes would lead to a severely limiting physical challenge that plagued Mom for her entire life. She developed hammertoes. Not just one toe, but all 10 of them. Her ability to walk was limited, it was impossible to find shoes that were comfortable, and she was deeply embarrassed of her deformed feet.

While it is true that there is not one type of therapy out there that will fit all children and adults who stutter, it is critical that parents and speech therapists are aware of the “size” options and understand the harm that can be done when the “size” doesn’t “fit”.

When our 27-year-old son who stutters was young, I, like my grandmother and shoes, figured that any therapy was better than no therapy. I wasn’t aware of the options so my only frame of reference was what we were experiencing at the time. The “size” options we had to choose from were for our son to

  • think about his breathing,
  • think about what his tongue was doing,
  • think about what his lips were doing,
  • pay attention to how his listener was reacting,
  • pay attention to when the listener made a speech error,
  • start his words with easy bounces, stretch out his words,
  • use appropriate inflection and think about what he was going to say before he said it,
  • and if all else failed, just tap.

The “fix” options were to stutter less or, at best, not stutter at all.

After six years of on-again, off-again therapy with a number of therapists, our son had increased speech tension, increased physical tension, and decreased engagement with friends, families, and his community. Looking back, I  now envision our son’s insides curling just like Mom’s toes. Then I would wonder how much worse he might be if we hadn’t taken him to therapy session after therapy session.

In the midst of this journey, I attended a national conference on stuttering. I had expressed my dissatisfaction with the outcomes of the therapy our son was receiving to a speech language therapist who was also a university professor. I remember feeling frustrated when she responded with “one size does not fit all” but I was not able to articulate why in the moment (isn’t that always how it goes?).

Now, thanks to this year’s ISAD theme, I have the opportunity to explore what I was feeling in this moment. “One size does NOT fit all” is a platitude. Wikipedia states that:

“A platitude is a trite, meaningless, or prosaic statement, often used as a thought-terminating cliché, aimed at quelling social, emotional, or cognitive unease. The statement may be true, but its meaning has been lost due to its excessive use. Platitudes have been criticized as giving a false impression of wisdom, making it easy to accept falsehoods 1”

Andrew Dana Purlang, a disability advocate and former Executive Director of the North Country Center for Independence, goes on to say that platitudes are:2

  • a statement that gives a false impression of wisdom, making it easy to accept falsehoods,
  • a sanctimonious cliché, a statement that is not only old and overused but often moralistic and imperious,
  • shallow statements that can lull us into accepting things that are actually false and foolish.

Bingo. I now have a better grasp on why this response didn’t feel helpful – in fact, in retrospect I think it did more harm than good. I felt it invalidated the negative reality of our experience, my pain and feelings, and pushed me towards accepting the therapy we were receiving because this suggested to me that the longer we accessed speech therapy, the more apt we were to find the right fit. We just had to keep on keeping on.

In the words of Raisa Gorbachev:

“Youth is, after all, just a moment, but it is the moment, the spark, that you always carry in your heart.3

Finding a therapist, seeking insurance approval, and determining if that therapist can provide helpful intervention can be a long process. We always went in with high hopes and hesitated giving up. What were we doing wrong? Somebody must be finding this therapy useful – why not us? How much more of our son’s childhood were we going to spend trying to find the right “size?” His childhood spark was already being greatly diminished by our quest for fluency.

Since that time I’ve learned that 88% to 91% of children who begin to show speech tension will see that tension subside with or without therapy. The remaining will persist to some degree into their teen and adult years. 4 The current narrative directed at parents is vague and can easily delude a blind-sided, heartbroken parent into chasing a fix. For instance, the following statement is widely touted by many professionals and organizations including the National Stuttering Association:

“early intervention is the most effective way to help children overcome their speaking difficulties. 5”

What do we mean by “early intervention”? What do we mean by “overcome”? What parent new to this challenge would not assume “overcome their speaking difficulties” means to fix; to make this behavior stop?  Parents will go out hell-bent on finding a fix like we did 25+ years ago. Why establish the expectation of a fix in parents’ minds in the first place? When the fix doesn’t happen, this only serves to exacerbate anxiety and the speech tension, secondary behaviors, and disengagement for those who will persist.

We are seeing an increased availability of approaches focused on minimizing the emotional toll that takes a bite out of short and long-term quality of life. It helps to know what we’re looking for. Parents I interviewed for my last book who began with an approach focused primarily on the emotional aspects of this challenge admitted that they “lucked” into it. They were not even aware this type of approach existed. In today’s world, it doesn’t have to be about luck – we can empower both parents and speech therapists to make informed decisions that will result in a far better fit than the focus on fixing that has dominated therapy for children for decades.

While there are still problems with the current narrative, new messaging that helps parents to understand the risks of focusing on a fix and the benefits of focusing on our children’s emotional well-being is becoming more prevalent. Parents deserve transparency–up front, not down the road after their child’s spark has dimmed because their childhood has been permeated with the message that we don’t like the way they talk so they should change the way they talk. Following is an example of what adults I interviewed for my recent book project had to say:

“For the most part, I was very lucky. I didn’t have any bullies or anyone making fun of me. The negative impact was a bit more insidious – just not talking and not saying what I wanted to say and feeling like when I did say something, it wasn’t right. Growing up, it got to the point where saying anything was better than saying what I really wanted to say.”

25-year-old Dwight

“What makes us human is our relationship with others, talking to other people. I was given the message in my childhood speech therapy that I couldn’t do that with a stutter.”

44-year-old Cyrus

“After the age of 8, I decided to not start anything new so I wouldn’t have to say my name.”

27-year-old Nadine

I am encouraged by many of the younger SLPs and SLP students I have connected with who are going against the grain, making waves, demanding change. I am inspired by those seasoned professionals who are embracing a different way of seeing stuttering and treating stuttering – with children and adults. Consumer education is key to keeping the momentum going. Even with so much information readily available, parents often don’t realize there is a need for them to seek out information beyond the speech therapists’ office. Here are more comments from parents I interviewed for my recent book:

“Sadly, when you’re parenting, you don’t know what you don’t know.”

Linda and John, parents to 41-year-old Courtney

“We were not educated about the different approaches. We just did what the therapist said. If parents don’t know what the options are, they’re not going to go looking for them.”

Trudi, mom to 11-year-old Clare

“All I wanted was a speech therapist who knew enough to know what they don’t know. Instead of wading in with “Let’s throw a bunch of stuff at this kid and see what sticks.”

We are all aware of different shoe sizes and styles, and it doesn’t take long to figure out if the shoe we’ve chosen is the right fit. This is not the case with speech therapy for children who stutter. When we try on different therapies with our children, the damage resulting from a bad fit is not near as obvious and can take a huge toll on both short and long-term quality of life.

Therapy must become more interactive, with speech therapists, parents and those who stutter seeing themselves as explorers and discoverers. All of the involved parties must understand the uncertainties, the risks, the difference between the “fit” being a fix, and a “fit” being an increased quality of life. Speech therapists can be helpful guides in the journey but they must have the skillset to empower families and children by addressing what really matters including:

  • Being a good listener and helping others become better listeners.
  • Recognizing the role that anxiety, both in the parent and the child, plays in exacerbation of the negative impact on quality of life.
  • Learning how to comfortably talk about stuttering with a parent, with a child, with a teacher, with a friend, with other family members.
  • Learning how to self-advocate and advocate as a parent.
  • Building a home environment that supports joyful communication and encourages acceptance, passion, and engagement in the world.
  • Helping parents and children become desensitize to the moments of stuttering.

“One size does NOT fit all,” so let’s be clear about what we mean when we say “size” and what we mean when we say “fit.”  Parents deserve better. Our kids deserve better. Our speech therapists deserve better. Many widely-accepted therapy approaches are not only the wrong size and fit for many, but like my mom’s too-small-shoes, can lead to a lifetime of challenge and impede quality of life.

Bottom line, there is nothing stopping us all from doing better. Let’s go.

Wikipedia, Nathan J. Robinson, “The Uses of Platitudes”, Current Affairs, August 23, 2017 online.

  1. https://disabilitythinking.com/disabilitythinking/2018/8/12/disability-platitudes
  2. Gorbacheva, R. https://quotes.pub/q/youth-is-after-all-just-a-moment-but-it-is-the-moment-the-sp-845715
  3. Yairi E., Ambrose N. Epidemiology of stuttering: 21st century advances. J Fluency Disord. 2013 Jun:38(2):66-87, doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2012.11.002.Epub 2012 Nov 27. PMID: 23773662:PMCID ONC3687212/
  4. https://westutter.org/what-is-stuttering/

Loading


Comments

One Size Does NOT Fit All – Dori Holte — 14 Comments

  1. Dear Dori,

    First, congratulations on the two well written books backed up by immense amount of work. You have shown true courage, true leadership qualities to investigate and document the current state of therapy. I have a series of questions to ask. I hope you answer them one at a time, so I will submit them one at a time.

    In the introduction to your submittal to this conference there is a statement “Holte interviews 60 adults to gain the long view of the impact of therapy focused on fixing.” Can you explain the phrase “therapy focused on fixing”? What do you mean by “fixing”? Are you examining the fixing of “speech problem” (as you write elsewhere in the book) or are you taking the holistic approach and consider not only addressing the “speech problem” but also the consequent cognitive/emotional dimension of the person who stutters? And what about the parents, the teachers, the community around the speaker?

    I assume that it would be more accurate if you would have said that you studied only the “…on fixing the speech problem.”

    I would like for you to interview some of my clients who have been treated in a holistic manner. Note I help them by first teaching them to adjust their mindset that might well propagate the problem, that only they can define because doesn’t “one set does not fit ALL” really have to deal what each of us define to be our problem and not only the silly counting of disfluencies?

    I apologize for being so garrulous. If you cannot see the forest for the trees let me try to rephrase it, “Does your book deal with all treatments of stuttering where stuttering which would include everything that is in the Gunars’ iceberg in my Facebook pages? Or is it limited to current ASHA sanctioned evidence based treatments of Fluency Shaping and Stuttering Modification delivered by the SLP’s sans the Cognitive Behavior Therapy and sans the Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy?

    I am really enjoying reading your book. It has evoked in me many, many more questions. Congratulations. In the past we have had our differences of opinions. What I really enjoy about this conference is that they (the ubiquitous censors) are allowing, for the first time and, maybe for the last, to ask the questions that establish “One size does not fit ALL” philosophy.

  2. Hi Gunars – great to hear from you! I’m glad you’re enjoying my new book. In answer to your questions:
    When I say “fix,” I mean therapy with the primary focus of wanting the stuttering to stop – I’m especially concerned with young children. If an adult want to use tools, techniques, or even chooses to switch up words or not speak, that’s their choice and I respect that. Most of the adults I interviewed who had gone down that road found it detracting from their quality of life and were relieved to find an approach addressing the emotional aspects of this challenge. I put out the call for interviewees several years ago within Facebook groups and would love to have interviewed some of your clients at that point. I’m done doing interviews – after 60, transcribing, editing, analyzing, I’ve done what I set out to do. The therapies covered are based on the experiences of those I interviewed, so no, it does not deal with “all treatments.” Again, thank you for your kind words and for taking the time to read the book and respond.

  3. Hi Dori,

    As always, it’s wonderful to read your contribution. This year’s theme seems to have opened up a great bit of dialogue on the need for honest talk about what the aim is when working with someone who stutters – be it a child who is receiving therapy at the behest of a parent, or an adult who is looking for support.

    I’m the one who came up with the theme – I had been thinking a lot about options and how best to get the word out that there is indeed options.

    Speech therapy students are still being trained on traditional fluency shaping approaches, including counting stuttered syllables and learning to write “Percent stuttered speech” as goals on IEPs (and putting kids in special education classes, with a need for an IEP, just because they stutter) is something I hope will change too.

    I think a big part of the problem is that professionals are called speech language pathologists (at least here in the US.) As we know, pathology means disease, and disease under the medical model is something that needs to be treated and cured. Stuttering is not a disease. It’s just how some people talk.

    I like how in the UK and other countries professionals are referred to as SLT, speech language therapist, so there is not an immediate implication that something is a pathology in need of fixing and eradicating. SLTs are in more of a position to be the guide you refer to, instead of the all powerful “Oz” who can fix the problem.

    I love your analogy of the ill fitted shoes. The impact of wearing the wrong size shoes can last a life time.

    You’ve done so much to challenge the status quo! Thank you.

    And more stuttering projects in the works – books or other media?

    Pam

  4. Hi Pam – thank you for taking the time to ready my submission and for your lovely response. I loved the theme – the incident in the hotel lobby immediately popped into my head and I was off to the races. So thank you for that! Yes – we need to get away from the focus on a fix – especially when only around 20% of children will see the behavior persist and at this point, indicators are vague and pretty meaningless. What message are we sending those kids who continue? I’m sure there are situations relating to speech where the label “pathology” is appropriate, but stuttering is not one of them!!

    I’m glad you liked my analogy – another image that popped into my head with the words “size” and “fit.”

    Right now I’m feeling there’s significant momentum for change in the field when it comes to addressing stuttering, especially when it comes to children. Now I want to support those efforts in any way I can. I am pleased to be working with universities to incorporate my books into their curriculum and to provide Q&A’s to students. That’s my main focus for the moment. As you say, the traditional fluency techniques still have a hold and that needs to change. Not sure I’m up for another book – man they are a lot of work!! I’m just grateful that I had the resources (both time and financial) to make it happen!

    Thank you again for your feedback. You too are doing so much to affect change and make this world a better place for those who stutter. I’m so glad we shared that bus ride oho so many years ago!!

  5. Dori,
    I loved reading your post. I am currently in school to be a speech-language pathologist so reading this really opened my eyes. As a future therapist, I plan to individualize each of my client’s treatment so that their treatment is appropriate for their own individual needs since stuttering is different for everyone. I like how you used the comparison of the too-small shoes. I wish you the best and thanks for sharing!
    Jenna

    • Thank you Jenna for reading my paper. As you move forward in your career, I hope you will really explore what options there are for individual treatment. It’s a tricky label and leaves the door wide open for parents who see the “need” as needing their child to be fixed. When I took our son to therapy, the only “need” I saw was to make it stop. We never worked with a therapist who was able to reframe my “need” to focus on not exacerbating the behavior and addressing the emotional factors. That is a special skillset that more and more therapists are pursuing. Not as straight-forward as teaching speech tools, but so much more helpful to successful long-term outcomes. Best of luck to you!!

  6. Dori,

    Thank you for sharing your experiences and other stories as well. In graduate school, we learn that there is no such thing as “cookie-cutter” therapy. Every patient is unique and different. Your analogies and metaphors helped paint a picture that not one size is everyone’s size. As a future SLP, I hope to carry that idea and practice with me throughout my career. I liked being able to read parents perspectives. I think the quote that got me the most was, “Sadly, when you’re parenting, you don’t know what you don’t know.” I am not a parent but this quote helped me see the importance of patient education.

    • Thank you for reading my paper. The unfortunate thing is that there IS cookie cutter therapy and it’s important for SLPs to understand what that might look like and explore the options. I hope you’ll take the time to read my latest book – it is full of parents and adult perspectives on childhood intervention. I know that courses on this topic in college are usually pretty light and even non-existent. Many therapists pursue this topic on their own – and that’s so important. Best of luck to you!!

  7. Hi Dori

    What you’re doing for parents to children who stutter is gold! But not only that. Educating SLPs so they understand there is no one therapy that fits all, but listening does. Parents don’t know what’s out there, so SLPs need to show the smörgåsbord of possibilities, not all needing to lead to fluency, but to happiness, the joy of speaking, finding the words to make others to understand and the self-worth to know stuttering is just one tiny part of you, while there is so much else to be proud of.

    I hope every parent reads your books.

    Happy ISAD and thanks for making them talk

    Anita

    • Thank you for that Anita – you’ve been so supportive. Your voice continues to ring out across the world and I am so grateful. Helping student SLPs become aware that there even is a smorgasbord of options with a variety of goals and outcomes – that’s a start!! Happy ISAD to you too and thank you for all you’ve done to make this happen!!

  8. Hello! Thank you so much for sharing your personal experience. This is a perspective that I have not encountered before. As a 2nd year graduate student who hopes to go into EI, this gives me hope and drive to ensure that parents are big parts of treatment that I provide. Parents know their kids better than we do and I will ensure that I keep open and honest dialogues with them as to what they are seeing with their kids and ensuring that I do not put their child into a treatment that is not the best fit for them individually. I look forward to reading more of your material.

    • Thank you for taking the time to read my paper. It’s important to parents and SLPs to be empowered with information that contributes to the “best fit.” It’s complicated!! Best of luck to you in your journey as an SLP and I hope my work supports that journey.

  9. Hi Dori,

    It was wonderful getting insight about your experiences from the parents perspective. I have worked as an SLPA in the school setting for 7 years. I’m currently in my last year as graduate student to become an SLP. I have seen the shift in fluency intervention and as a future SLP, I value your perspective and your points of how we can empower PWS and their families.

  10. Congratulations to you for pursuing your SLP degree. There has been a shift and for that I am grateful. I hope the momentum for change increases and SLPs like yourself have the skills and knowledge to support that shift. Thank you for taking the time to read my paper and I hope my work can impact your connections with families! Best of luck to you.